We have updated our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By accessing or using this Website, you accept and agree to be bound by our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.
If you do not agree with our policies, do not access or use our website. Our Privacy Policy explains the types of information we may collect from you or that you may provide,
as well as our practices for collecting, using, maintaining, protecting, and disclosing that information.
Accept

Advocacy


Published on Feb 17, 2025

Bill to improve the PRA protection against commercial use sees action

Contact: Candice Bock, Matt Doumit

A bill that clarifies and improves the Public Record Act’s (PRA) existing restriction on the use of certain records for commercial purposes is slated for action ahead of the February 21 policy committee cutoff deadline. AWC supports the bill.

HB 1964 is sponsored by Rep. Mary Fosse (D–Everett). The bill requires a person requesting a list of individuals under the PRA to sign a “declaration of noncommercial purpose” attesting under penalty of perjury that the list is not being requested for commercial purposes. The Attorney General’s Office is required to create a template for such declarations.

The PRA already prohibits requesters from requesting lists of individuals for commercial purposes. However, public agencies are generally restricted from asking requesters what the purpose of their request is for, except for inquiring about potential commercial use for lists. Washington Courts have decided that agencies have a duty to investigate the purpose of a request if they have an indication a list might be used for a commercial purpose. Agencies are pulled in two different directions – they are required to prevent lists from being used for commercial purposes, but they can only ask what the request is for if they already have an indication it might be for a commercial purpose.

AWC supports this bill to better enforce the current protections against using public records for commercial purposes, and taking cities out of the position of having ask for the purpose of a request. One minor amendment that AWC plans to suggest is to more clearly tie the new language on declarations of noncommercial purpose back to the section of the PRA that prohibits use of public records lists for commercial purposes – to maintain consistency within the PRA. Cities should testify or sign in support of the bill at its hearing this week.

 

Dates to remember


HB 1964 is scheduled for a hearing in the House State Government & Tribal Relations Committee on February 18 at 1:30 pm, and is scheduled for a committee vote on February 21 at 8 am.

  • Advocacy
  • Open government

 

Recent articles


  • Multiple excavators on one ticket issue resolved, for now, as “dig law” bill progresses

  • Operating budgets pass committees with mixed news for cities, capital budgets next up

  • State Transportation Commission directives, project streamlining practices updated in Senate transportation budget – Contact AWC with your city input

  • Speeding accountability bill sets sights on repeat offenders with assistive technology

  • The Puget Sound Nutrients General Permit is now voluntary

  • Automated vehicle noise enforcement cameras bill targets street racing

  • Bill proposes reforms to the Multifamily Property Tax Exemption authority

  • Senate payroll tax proposal scheduled for hearing

  • ADU self-certification bill passes Legislature

  • Legislature looks at authorizing kit home building code

  • Cities express concerns to Senate about bill to bypass prosecutors

  • Bill to reward decreases in competency orders heard in Senate, set for vote

  • Weapons ban for parks and public buildings advances toward House floor vote

  • Co-response bill picks up new definition for ‘co-response’

  • Show your support for another House bill to revise the property tax cap

  • Prescriptive GMA bill continues through Senate unamended

  • Now is the time to engage on small city police arbitration bill

  • AWC’s preferred approach to impounded vehicles is on the move

  • Show your support for a Senate bill to revise the property tax cap

  • 2025-27 transportation budget proposals, compared

  • Clarifying Treasury’s notice on ARPA-SLFRF obligation reporting deadline

  • Sign in to show support for bill on mandatory community custody after gun offenses

  • A bill with a simple cause—ending diaper rash

  • Childcare occupancy bill intends to open more space in churches

  • Parking bill is amended but concerns remain

  • Senate committee to hear public input on House-passed safety bill

  • Social equity cannabis business siting moves across chambers

  • A simple solution to the intent of the Housing Accountability Act

  • Bill to recognize two Islamic holidays continues path through the legislature

  • Personnel records bill slated for hearing in the Senate

  • Cities need to sign in opposed to AI bargaining bill at hearing this week

  • PFML job protections getting attention in Senate labor committee

  • The Public Works Assistance Account needs cities’ help: oppose new diversions

  • Cities may soon see increase to relocation assistance payments cap

  • City transportation plans may need to begin issuing tribal impact assessments

  • State revenue forecast reduced, increasing risk to city priorities

  • Washington state housing bills update at house of origin cutoff

  • Cities oppose bill undermining grievance settlements

  • Bill to classify speeding 30 mph over the limit as reckless driving passes Senate

  • Bill that changes existing public safety sales tax to councilmanic passes the Senate

  • $100 million grants for police hiring bill fails to advance – Could return down the stretch

  • Washington city officials take on the other Washington

  • Bill to limit roles of law enforcement volunteers dies in House

  • Expanded medical exemptions to drug, paraphernalia prosecutions clears House vote

  • Congress takes debate on federal budget down to the wire

  • Mandatory use of a hearing examiner bill is on fast track in House

    <