We have updated our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By accessing or using this Website, you accept and agree to be bound by our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.
If you do not agree with our policies, do not access or use our website. Our Privacy Policy explains the types of information we may collect from you or that you may provide,
as well as our practices for collecting, using, maintaining, protecting, and disclosing that information.
Accept

Advocacy


Published on Feb 01, 2017

Confusion and legal questions surround "sanctuary city" executive order

Contact:

President Trump's executive order to withhold federal funds to sanctuary cities has caused confusion about what is a "sanctuary city," raised a host of legal questions, and led San Francisco to be the first city in the U.S. to file a lawsuit alleging the executive order is unconstitutional and exceeds the President's power.

  • An article by The Olympian explores the position of several Washington cities and legal analysis by Hugh Spitzer, University of Washington law professor.
  • NLC's CitiesSpeak blog outlines legal steps sanctuary cities can take if they lose funding.
  • In response to the executive order, NLC released a statement asking the Federal government, not cities, to fix the immigration system.
  • Advocacy
  • Federal

 

Recent articles


Related content

bill-iconAWC's bill tracker

Visit AWC’s bill tracker to learn about legislation with city impacts this year.

Copyright © 2018-2025 Association of Washington Cities