We have updated our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By accessing or using this Website, you accept and agree to be bound by our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.
If you do not agree with our policies, do not access or use our website. Our Privacy Policy explains the types of information we may collect from you or that you may provide,
as well as our practices for collecting, using, maintaining, protecting, and disclosing that information.
Accept

Advocacy


Published on Sep 11, 2020

Treasury issues conflicting guidance for CARES Act CRF funds

Contact: Candice Bock, Jacob Ewing

The U.S. Treasury recently issued new guidance for recipients of Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) payments. Cities should be aware that these updates impact documentation requirements.

The updated CRF guidance and FAQ provide new requirements for documenting proof that an employee’s time was ‘substantially dedicated’ to responding to the Coronavirus pandemic. New language begins on page five of the guidance document and focuses on use of funds to cover payroll. In the FAQ document, questions A.53 to 56 were added, and Questions A.34 and A.38 were revised.

The main issue that arises in the new documents is the conflicting language between the guidance and FAQ. Previously and in the current FAQ, the Treasury states that CRF recipients “may presume” that an employee was substantially dedicated to mitigating the emergency. However, the updated guidance document requires that: “The relevant unit of government should maintain documentation of the ‘substantially dedicated’ conclusion with respect to its employees.” Until now, governments have been relying on the “may presume” language in the FAQs for months in the absence of guidance from the Treasury.

The National League of Cities has opened dialogue with the Treasury to seek clarification on this issue.

AWC contacted the Department of Commerce regarding these changes. Commerce is aware of the contradictory language; however, Commerce believes that the direction and FAQ’s distributed by the department are already in line with the more stringent Treasury guidance to maintain documentation.

AWC encourages cities to review the document with their legal counsel to ensure compliance with the new guidance and FAQ.

  • Budget & finance
  • Advocacy

 

Recent articles


Related content

bill-iconAWC's bill tracker

Visit AWC’s bill tracker to learn about legislation with city impacts this year.

Copyright © 2018-2025 Association of Washington Cities