We have updated our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By accessing or using this Website, you accept and agree to be bound by our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.
If you do not agree with our policies, do not access or use our website. Our Privacy Policy explains the types of information we may collect from you or that you may provide,
as well as our practices for collecting, using, maintaining, protecting, and disclosing that information.
Accept

Advocacy


Published on Jan 28, 2019

“Best available science” for critical area planning bill is heard

Contact: Carl Schroeder, Shannon McClelland

A bill providing a great deal of new language around how cities and counties develop a record of their utilization of “best available science” concerning critical area planning was heard in the Senate Local Government Committee on January 24.

SB 5245, sponsored by Sen. Shelly Short (R–Addy), provides a definition for “best available science.” The bill also modifies the best available science to be used, and considerations to be made, in designating and protecting critical areas. We would appreciate a review of this proposal and your thoughts on areas that are problematic or helpful.

The bill also provides that cities may retain and examine scientific experts in front of the growth management hearings boards, as well as providing that authority to other parties. We would also appreciate your perspective on that change. AWC testified that we wanted a close consideration of unintended consequences with this bill.

  • Land use & planning
  • Advocacy

 

Recent articles


Related content

bill-iconAWC's bill tracker

Visit AWC’s bill tracker to learn about legislation with city impacts this year.

Copyright © 2018-2025 Association of Washington Cities